« Eircom are a bunch of c*nts | Main | Sweet nothings »
July 30, 2005
Photo competition
I was asked today (well, I guess yesterday now, but I always count the awake periods of time as days...) to judge a photo competition.
I'm no Ansel Adams, but thankfully given the nature of this competition, landscape was the farthest thing from my mind.
I was asked to judge a discrete ass photography competition.
Two friends of mine would use their camera phones to take pictures of girls (girls asses).
The winner would be judged on beauty, general appeal / sexiness and proximity and whatever else criteria that occurred to me at the time (I was rushed, I based it all on a ugt reaction to the shots).
So here are the pictures, the commentary and the winners. Let me know what you think.
1:
Top marks for apparent age and the fact that the trackies look like they are about to fall off her. Losing points for proximity, lack of facial shot and the fact that she seems to be hanging out in the park with her dads mates
2:
Classic beauty. Like two puppy dogs rolling around in a silk sack. Nice figure and obviously affectionate. Fair points for proximity, good points for general bounciness, but losing points for the fact that she is hanging off her boyfriend and not her bikini clad lesbian lover.
3:
The lovely spectacle of tanned underage limbs and midriffs combined with a subtle panties adjustment is somewhat marred by the foreground. Top marks for variety and youthfullness, losing marks for foreground and proximity.
4:
Tis a pity the soft curve of her buttocks couldnt have been accentuated by the tightly drawn skirt that would have occured mid-stride. Behold the loveliness of her legs, the soft grey cashmere sweater and the pseudo tennis player skirt that thrills and teases us with memories of Anna Kournicova et al. Top marks for figure and proximity. Lost marks due to lack of 'definition'
5:
Tatoos. Pink velure. Midriff. Definition. This picture has it all. She is obviously a D4 girl trying to look like a bit of trash. She succeds and I for one am loving it. Extra points for the suggestion that her kacks might at any moment fall to her ankles. Sassy. Excellent marks for figure and proximity and definition. Extra marks for approaching soft porn territory. Well done that man.
6:
fabulous figure and lovely hair (what I can see of it). the teasing of the forbidden barely covered by the top adds to the depth and mystery of this moody picture. what is she thinking? Makes us want to know her more. While the last picture was a wham bam thank you mam sort - this ones for the long run. Good marks for proximity, fair marks for definition, top marks for figure and general attractiveness
7:
ooh. Denim skirt. Lovin it. The graceful line of th eleg draws the eye toward the distressed edges of the skirt teasing the imagination. Obviously loves the cock. Top marks for fine pair of pins, loses marks for lack of anything else. Fair marks for proximity.
8:
Not really much to see here. A second later and maybe a nice profile would have emerged. As it is the photograph (no comment on the subject) fails to titilate. Good marks for proximity low marks elsewhere
9:
WHo doesnt love the carnival? The question is will they keep that get up on in bed? Imaginings of what you might get up to with three lovely ladies who can flick their hips to a samba beat is marred by the appearance of Saint Bono in the foreground. Poor marks for proximity, good marks for figures an general allure
10:
Compared to her mates shes fantastic. The added spice of the fact that she is obviously foreign only adds to her appeal. She is obviouly into virile animals and might even be sensitive enough to make you feel like one. Good figure, fair points for proximity and added points for general appeal
Number 5 won it followed closely by number 6.
It was a pleasure to judge...
Posted by dottie at July 30, 2005 1:33 AM